3 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif
Jaxsun said in February 15th, 2007 at 10:52 am

be sure you’re comparing apples to apples when looking at effieciencies. Cell eff and Module eff are two different things. The difference being the losses resulting from encapsulating the cells into a mudule. The “clear” top sheeting isn’t exactly clear (resulting on losses), the traces on the cell block sunlight (more loss) and stringing cells together results in higher terminal and line currents (if/when paralleled) resulting in greater resistive losses. Point being, the chart above is “Cell” efficiencies, don’t expect to see modules quite that high. Although the overall trend will be the same.

mygif

[...] Jaxsun however pointed out from the previous post that this can be misleading since this is on a cell level and not on a panel level (panels have loss).    [...]

mygif
SRoeCo Solar said in December 19th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

Jaxsun makes a great point. Solar panels are not like computers. If you always waited to buy a faster computer, you’d never own one.

Rebates only decrease over time as the gov’t has temporarily provided money to get solar started, not to keep it going.

And every $ you pay in electricity bills is rent money to the electric company. If you install solar panels, then every $ you don’t pay to the electric company goes to pay off the cost of solar. And eventually (when you’ve saved as much money as the solar system cost), then every $ saved is money in your pocket.

Cheers,
Shawn

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)